Monday, April 27, 2009
Lately, there's been a lot of news about the torture techniques that have been used on "enemy combatants" to illicit information. But quite frankly I have a hard time with the fact that there's any debate at all. Yes, I'm aware that sometimes prisoners hold information that could be considered vital but isn't the refusal to use torture what's suppose to separate us from being barbarians ourselves? Aren't we suppose to be a nation that stands for high principles even when those principles aren't easy or convenient? To suggest that something like waterboarding is "legal" has to be the ultimate in legal hair splitting. No wonder our international reputation is at an all time low. How can we call for others to respect human rights when we don't? As has been said by many, being a free democratic society isn't for the faint of heart.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Brad, I could not agree. Maybe this is something the justice subgroup of our outreach team could focus on.
I mean I could not agree MORE!
Brad, I agree completely. In addition, history has shown that the quality of information obtained through torture is questionable, at best. Note this article from Time's May 4, 2009 edition:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1893509,00.html
Apparently, the long web address of the Time article didn't fit on the blog screen. The title is "Dumb Intelligence," by Robert Baer.
Bethany could organize a discussion group on the topic of torture. One possible resource is "Way of
Torture, Way of the Cross" by Dr. George Hunsinger of Princeton Theological Seminary. Leader and participant guides for this 4-session discussion are inexpensive or could be downloaded from some web sites. You can begin a search for more info on this resource or find suggestions for others by googling "Way of Torture, Way of the Cross" or "Wisconsin Council of Churches".
Post a Comment